Bending gender
in Bertrand Blier
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact manchesterhive@manchester.ac.uk for pricing options.

ACCESS TOKENS

If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

That Bertrand Blier is misogynistic in his film-making has increasingly come to be a given of Blier criticism and reviews. His deliberate attempt to go beyond the conventional limits of gender representation is as important example of the many processes of narrative subversion. Blier's characteristic approach, and one which has earned him this reputation of a misogynist film-maker, is to work with outwardly conventional gendered roles which define the female subject in three key ways. These are by the image she projects, by her position with regard to the male subject and, by the nature of the action executed by the female subject and the influence of this on narrative organisation and development. It is precisely through the performance of subversive bodily acts in Blier's work that female identity achieves a liberating instability, or permeability which accords with the type of representation we find in the popular tradition.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 38 14 0
Full Text Views 21 14 0
PDF Downloads 3 2 1