Introduction
in Five directors
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact manchesterhive@manchester.ac.uk for pricing options.

ACCESS TOKENS

If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

This chapter presents the pre-history of auteurism and shows that there have been vigorous debates about the condition and prospects of auteur cinema in France over the last decade. It summarises the development of auteurism as a field up to the 1990s, drawing particularly on Wright Wexman's historical overview. Following the advent of structuralism and structuralist approaches to narrative and communication in the mid 1960s, a type of auteurism was born that preserved a focus on authorship at the very moment when Roland Barthes was polemically declaring the author dead, in his famous essay 'The death of the author'. The chapter also summarises the legal advances achieved by struggles for legislation aiming to afford better protection for directors. It assesses how auteur cinema is still one vital pole of francophone film production, albeit in a very different form from that envisaged by the politique des auteurs in the 1950s.

Five directors

Auteurism from Assayas to Ozon

Editor: Kate Ince

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 31 10 0
Full Text Views 22 10 0
PDF Downloads 6 4 0