Olivier Assayas and the cinema of catastrophe
in Five directors
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact manchesterhive@manchester.ac.uk for pricing options.


If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

This chapter presents an account of the development of Olivier Assayas' career, before seeking to explore this idea of what one might call 'catastrophe cinema.' It deals with his distrust of the politique des auteurs, and in particular of the canon of classical Hollywood directors that it championed - he has criticised academic film studies for setting in stone classical Hollywood as the only period worthy of study, the result of an 'historic cinephilia', which has mummified and excluded certain filmmakers. As Fin août, début septembre and Irma Vep demonstrate, Assayas has a complex relationship with notions of authorship. He has allied himself to a particular perspective in both theoretical and practical terms yet he is acutely aware of the dangers of a theory that has been co-opted by academia. The 'catastrophic mode' adopted by Assayas' film might offer an alternative to the traditional critical strategy defended by Elizabeth Walden.

Five directors

Auteurism from Assayas to Ozon

Editor: Kate Ince


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 72 41 4
Full Text Views 16 1 0
PDF Downloads 2 1 1