Conclusion
in Jean Renoir
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact manchesterhive@manchester.ac.uk for pricing options.

ACCESS TOKENS

If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

This conclusion presents some closing thoughts on the key concepts discussed in the preceding chapters of this book. Produced with a range of different collaborators, in widely varying circumstances and production contexts, Jean Renoir's work must be located in a world undergoing massive and often traumatic change, one rent by competing ideologies and war. Rather than seeking some impossible synthesis, it is better to trace its evolution, identifying periods of relative consistency and crucial turning points that gave it a new direction. The silent period films are interesting for their technical innovation and visual inventiveness. The early 1930s are dominated by adaptations of novels and boulevard theatre and take from them a critique of the bourgeoisie that is at times gentle and at times acerbic but always inwardlooking. Some of Renoir's Hollywood output explores tensions in American mythology to a limited degree without ever subverting it (Swamp Water, The Southerner).

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 35 17 0
Full Text Views 27 10 0
PDF Downloads 8 4 1