Writing history as it happens
The historian’s dilemmas in a time of health-care reform
in Communicating the history of medicine
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact manchesterhive@manchester.ac.uk for pricing options.


If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

This chapter examines ways in which historians of medicine can reach the wider public and have an impact on policy debates. Using the US Affordable Care Act as a case study, it describes how historians have engaged in correcting health policy falsehoods, disseminating historical research to a wider audience, cautiously applying the lessons of history to policy, and even direct advocacy. It ends by cautioning that historical research and publication must still be valued for their own sakes, apart from its ‘impact’ outside the academy.

Communicating the history of medicine

Perspectives on audiences and impact


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 60 60 7
Full Text Views 0 0 0
PDF Downloads 0 0 0