The audiences of eugenics
Historiographical and research political reflections
in Communicating the history of medicine
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact for pricing options.


If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

This chapter discusses the reception of recent historical work on eugenics and compulsory sterilization in Denmark. The contrast between the media’s view of this work as a criticism of eugenics and the author’s view of it as an attempt to study eugenics on its own historical terms is discussed as an example of a complicated case of ‘audiencing’. The chapter further attempts to historicize the notion of grand societal challenges in science. The fear of degeneration of the genetic quality of the population was one such grand challenge in the early twentieth century, when the effects of scientists’ perceived social responsibility in actively promoting eugenics had very undesirable results.

Communicating the history of medicine

Perspectives on audiences and impact


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 70 70 1
Full Text Views 1 1 0
PDF Downloads 1 1 0