Striking a chord
Physician-publics, citizen-audiences and a half-century of health-care debates in Canada
in Communicating the history of medicine
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact for pricing options.


If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

This chapter examines five decades of historical writing on, and myth-making about, the origins of Medicare, Canada’s public health-care system. It examines interpretations of the 1962 doctors’ strike in Saskatchewan, and its reception and uptake among physician and citizen audiences. Within the medical profession, academic and professional elites have vied to capture attention from Canadian citizen-audiences. A pro-Medicare consensus, emergent in the 1960s and 1970s, was replaced in the early 2000s by a newly polarized view, critical of public health care, which reinterprets the history of the strike action as a form of justified public protest.

Communicating the history of medicine

Perspectives on audiences and impact


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 48 48 5
Full Text Views 0 0 0
PDF Downloads 0 0 0