Pascale Drouet
Search for other papers by Pascale Drouet in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Conclusion
in Shakespeare and the denial of territory
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

The way banishment and abuse of power are articulated participates, both upstream and downstream, in a dialectics of deterritorialisation and reterritorialisation, a dynamic whose driving force remains a form of transgression. The banished person is forced to follow a trajectory entailing various types of crossing, whether domestic or political, physical or mental, and any crossing implies risk-taking and uncertainty as regards the future. Downstream, because abusive banishment generates either a dynamic of riposte, that is, a ‘boomerang’ effect, or a dynamic of deviation, in which ruse proves useful, or a dialectics of endurance and exhaustion. Upstream, because political mismanagement or individual abuse triggers questioning and challenging by fearless speakers. Their ‘irruptive truth-telling’ (Foucault) is felt by the banisher as a parrhesiastic deterritorialisation and this is why he answers with geographic exclusion, which is perceived as abusive banishment by the parrhesiast. The dialectics of territorialisation, deterritorialisation and reterritorialisation highlights the danger not only of abuses of power as such, but also, due to the spiral they initiate, of their repercussions, of their retributive effects. It ultimately invites us to consider and reflect upon the challenge that exercising power represents.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Shakespeare and the denial of territory

Banishment, abuse of power and strategies of resistance

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 93 48 2
Full Text Views 0 0 0
PDF Downloads 0 0 0