Food riots and the languages of hunger
in The politics of hunger
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact for pricing options.


If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

Rather than questioning the nutritional deficiencies of subsistence protestors or asking what hungry people do, this chapter asks how hunger as an idea, a discourse, was mobilised by poor and the rulers of Britain alike. Hunger, it suggests, was a constant spectral presence, something mortally feared by the poor who wondered how they might feed their families and by the rich as the possible trigger for disorder and sedition. This complex interplay – much like E.P. Thompson’s ‘moral economy’ – was understood by both sides. The poor mobilised the fear of hunger as likely to have mortal consequences not only for themselves but also for the rich in threatening letters and as threats made during food riots; the rulers of local communities acted preemptively in the emergence of relief funds and in developing new forms of surveillance.

The politics of hunger

Protest, poverty and policy in England, c. 1750–c. 1850


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 45 45 8
Full Text Views 0 0 0
PDF Downloads 3 3 3