S. H. Rigby
Search for other papers by S. H. Rigby in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Conclusion
Chaucer: validity in interpretation
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

It would seem that on virtually every aspect of Geoffrey Chaucer's work, his readers are currently assailed by a host of mutually exclusive interpretations and critical approaches. On the one hand, Chaucer is an Augustinian allegorist; on the other, he is sceptical about exegesis as a mode of interpretation and satirises the excesses of moral allegorising. On the one hand, he is a misogynist; on the other, he a defender of women. This book emphasises the ways in which seeing Chaucer in the context of the political issues, social values, generic conventions and literary theory of his own day can help us to understand the meaning of his work. It concludes that what a contextual approach to Chaucer's work reveals, above all else, is that literary texts are nowhere more historical in their nature than when they seek to pass themselves off as timeless and dehistoricised.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

Chaucer in context

Society, allegory and gender

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 816 406 5
Full Text Views 26 16 4
PDF Downloads 21 12 2