The problem of treason
The trial of Daire le Roux
in Law, laity and solidarities
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact manchesterhive@manchester.ac.uk for pricing options.

ACCESS TOKENS

If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

In c. 1150 the author of Le roman de Thèbes supplemented a retelling of Statius's Thebaid with an original episode in which King Eteocles' appeal of treason against his man Daire le Roux is debated in the king's court. A fuller study of imaginary treason trials yields different conclusions partly because it reveals noteworthy continuities throughout this period not just in the motifs and stock characters found in trial scenes but in the manner of representing the bilateral ordeal (that is, a judicial duel or trial by battle) as an effective means of disproving false accusations of treason. In addition, the study of trial scenes shows significant continuities in the representation of treason against a lord, not as a clearly definable offence against so-called 'feudal law', but rather as a politically and legally problematic category of wrongdoing.

Law, laity and solidarities

Essays in honour of Susan Reynolds

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 22 22 4
Full Text Views 0 0 0
PDF Downloads 1 1 1