Chari Larsson
Search for other papers by Chari Larsson in
Current site
Google Scholar
Timely anachronisms
in Didi-Huberman and the image
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

This chapter shifts its attention to the role anachronism plays in Didi-Huberman’s thinking. Art history as a narrative structure has traditionally been sustained by chronological time, with art historians implicitly drawing on Hegel’s teleological progression as a model for artistic improvement. When the Hegelian narrative establishing art’s history is exhausted, however, what models of time are available? Didi-Huberman adds his voice to the anti-Hegelian current characterising French thought since the 1960s. Like Michel Foucault and Jacques Derrida before him, Didi-Huberman avoids a direct confrontation with Hegel, but engages through intermediaries Aby Warburg and Walter Benjamin. Didi-Huberman rereads the great avant-garde montage experiments of the 1920s and 1930s in relation to a general antagonism to linear understandings of time.

  • Collapse
  • Expand


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 533 118 11
Full Text Views 1 1 0
PDF Downloads 2 2 0