James D. Fry
Search for other papers by James D. Fry in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Bryane Michael
Search for other papers by Bryane Michael in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Natasha Pushkarna
Search for other papers by Natasha Pushkarna in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
The jurisprudence of organizations’ aspirational values
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

This chapter continues to illustrate the quantitative links from the first chapters by concentrating on various substantive principles. These substantive principles act as the main drivers of international organizations law, in contrast to procedural principles. The chapter shows, using the same kind of analysis as in the previous chapter, how equality, peace, representativeness and autonomy mean something together and separately, depending on the constitutions being discussed. Unequal relations between states can never form the basis of peace between states, as the UN Charter and other constitutions attest. State sovereignty may represent the ultimate type of autonomy, but representation in an international organization may actually bolster both the autonomy of the state and the international organization concerned. Such apparent contradictions bedevil all aspects of constitutional interpretation. Valuing these principles and knowing their value in promoting a principle like peace requires a holistic understanding of these constitutions in context.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 539 233 107
Full Text Views 40 38 1
PDF Downloads 25 22 0