A relationship of trust and confidence
in Medicine, patients and the law (sixth edition)
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact manchesterhive@manchester.ac.uk for pricing options.

ACCESS TOKENS

If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

A Relationship of Trust and Confidence: Doctors must be able to keep secrets but the obligation is not absolute. This chapter examines the nature of the duty of confidentiality and explores the circumstances in which disclosure to others is justified or required. Considering landmark cases such as W v Egdell and Campbell v MGN and guidance from the General Medical Council, we chart the development of the legal claims for breach of confidence and the implications of a developing right to privacy, ‘misuse of private information’. In the latter part of the chapter, we consider the difficult issue of genetic privacy and the complex provisions of the Data Protection Act.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 17 17 5
Full Text Views 0 0 0
PDF Downloads 2 2 1