Margaret Brazier
Search for other papers by Margaret Brazier in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Emma Cave
Search for other papers by Emma Cave in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Agreeing to treatment
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

In the landmark 2015 Supreme Court decision of Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board, the much criticised decision of the House of Lords in Sidaway v Royal Bethlem Hospital was consigned to history. No longer are adults with mental capacity only entitled to be told what doctors think it is appropriate to tell them. This chapter considers the torts of battery and negligence, exploring the right to consent and the right to say ‘no’ to treatment. What is meant by consent? How much must a doctor tell a patient? Can a doctor withhold information from a patient in her best interests (the so-called ‘therapeutic privilege’)?

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 844 253 79
Full Text Views 209 23 0
PDF Downloads 175 15 0