Malpractice litigation
in Medicine, patients and the law (sixth edition)
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact manchesterhive@manchester.ac.uk for pricing options.

ACCESS TOKENS

If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

The patient wishing to claim clinical negligence faces a number of problems. How can a lawsuit be funded? Which health professional caused the injury? As a result of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO), legal aid has been withdrawn for most clinical negligence claims. A radically reformed system for conditional fee agreements (CFAs) became the primary source of funding for clinical negligence claims. But the NHS Litigation Authority (NHSLA) reports high levels of claims that the NHS struggles to bear. Resources are limited and money spent defending claims is money that cannot be spent on healthcare. Are we in the midst of a compensation culture? Are doctors becoming increasingly defensive? The civil litigation system struggles to balance justice to patients and affordability to the NHS.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 19 19 2
Full Text Views 0 0 0
PDF Downloads 1 1 1