Anna Green
Search for other papers by Anna Green in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Kathleen Troup
Search for other papers by Kathleen Troup in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Anthropology and ethnohistorians
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

In the second half of the nineteenth century there were many parallels between the disciplines of history and anthropology. Both employed an empiricist methodology. This chapter briefly outlines the main currents of thought in anthropology. It examines the influence of two specific approaches that were to be fertile ground for historians: everyday life and symbolic anthropology, and ethnohistory. In the context of these approaches to history research and writing, the chapter also examines the key concept of 'ethnicity'. Two schools of thought within anthropology emerged in Britain and the United States. These schools were characterized respectively as social anthropology and cultural anthropology. Ethnohistorians particularly seek to bring into view the experiences and perspectives of indigenous and minority peoples in colonial contexts. One of the significant achievements of ethnohistory has been to approach all those engaged in cultural encounter as active agents who jointly determined the outcome.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

The houses of history

A critical reader in history and theory, second edition

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 690 295 40
Full Text Views 259 49 0
PDF Downloads 375 66 0