Mark Olssen
Search for other papers by Mark Olssen in
Current site
Google Scholar
Continuance ethics, objectivity, Kant
in Constructing Foucault’s ethics
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

Chapter 4 examines the senses in which continuance ethics derived from Foucault, Canguilhem, and Nietzsche can claim objectivity by comparing the sense of objectivity claimed to the metaphysical sense of objectivity argued for by Derek Parfit. While it is claimed that the objectivity established is certainly different to traditional metaphysical conceptions, it still warrants being labelled as objective, and is clearly not a species of subjectivism, the dominant approach in moral philosophy for most of the twentieth century. It is objective also in that it avoids any possibility of being classified as relativistic. After this cartography of the concept, Kantian ethics is considered and rejected. Life continuance is then restated as embodying a new reconciliation of the right with the good, as well as going beyond universalism to consider contingency and cultural difference as important contextual considerations.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • Top

Constructing Foucault’s ethics

A poststructuralist moral theory for the twenty-first century


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 39 39 18
Full Text Views 0 0 0
PDF Downloads 0 0 0