Matthew Stibbe
Search for other papers by Matthew Stibbe in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Conclusion
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

The conclusion begins with a critique of the way that the revolution was presented in the centenary commemorations in 2018–19. Much was obscured amidst the desire to package the revolution to suit presentist concerns with reductive ‘lessons’ for democracy. Overall, the way that the centenary was handled makes it more likely that 1918–19 will remain largely forgotten and unknown as a real historical event in real historical time. Nonetheless, the conclusion does go on to suggest three areas in which research might fruitfully develop over the next two decades; a recognition that cultural determinism can bring with it an exaggerated and at times ahistorical concentration on political fragmentation at the expense of elements of cohesion; a move towards capturing unscripted ways of seeing, hearing, feeling and living the political intensity of the revolution, and thus unleashing its diverse emancipatory potential; and finally, a focus on the way in which competing or overlapping ideas about popular sovereignty were medialised and communicated in the revolution’s immediate aftermath and in the period up to the inauguration of the new constitution on 11 August 1919.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 317 257 7
Full Text Views 36 32 0
PDF Downloads 23 19 0