Mimi Ensley
Search for other papers by Mimi Ensley in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Introduction
Palimpsests – Reformation, romance and erasure
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

This introductory chapter situates this study within existing scholarship on the post-Reformation reception of later medieval literature. It defines the medieval romance genre and explores the various threads of the book’s methodology: its interest in periodisation, memory studies and materiality. It also introduces the book’s framing metaphors – the catalogue, the collage, the monument, and the museum – as possible alternatives to the notion of the palimpsest. The palimpsest is a useful metaphor for understanding the relationships between present and past, as it emphasises materiality and complicates notions of linear historical progress and simple chronological development. However, it is easy to forget that the palimpsest is a metaphor fundamentally based on erasure. By focusing on the genre of romance, Difficult pasts offers an alternative to a literary history centred on erasure. The new metaphors explored in this chapter embrace the temporal complexity of the past, but they also highlight early modern efforts to preserve and engage with, rather than destroy, medieval predecessors.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

Difficult pasts

Post-Reformation memory and the medieval romance

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 237 195 9
Full Text Views 32 31 1
PDF Downloads 21 20 1