Diana Donald
Search for other papers by Diana Donald in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Introduction
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

The introduction sketches out the existing historiography of the nineteenth-century animal protection movement, which evinces many conflicting approaches and shortcomings. In particular, historians have generally failed to appraise women’s key contributions to the movement, and, more generally, to analyse gendered differences in attitudes to animals. Traditions of thought on man’s responsibility to the ‘lower’ species were religiously inspired, but also strongly influenced by social and political factors, and by assumptions about the priority of human interests. They came under scrutiny for the first time when legislation was proposed in the early 1800s to make cruelty to animals, especially bull-baiting, a criminal offence. The resulting debates in the British parliament, dominated by William Windham’s speeches, threw up philosophical difficulties which would haunt animal protectionists for the rest of the century. They also revealed disproportionate female support for protection, and the ridicule that this already attracted.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

Women against cruelty (revised edition)

Protection of animals in nineteenth-century Britain

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 165 43 6
Full Text Views 45 31 1
PDF Downloads 32 19 2