Matthew M. Heaton
Search for other papers by Matthew M. Heaton in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Regulating the overland route
Sudanese reforms and the Nigerian Pilgrimage Scheme, 1926–45
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

Chapter 3 examines the negotiations between Nigeria, Sudan, and the recently established Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to establish control over the movement of West African pilgrims. The main goal of British colonial reforms was to streamline the movement of overland pilgrims to the agricultural sectors of Sudan, where they contributed greatly to the colonial economy, and then onward to the port of Suakin to cross the Red Sea. Pilgrims resisted and evaded the official routes in a number of ways, however, with the result that mass repatriations of destitute West Africans from Saudi Arabia back to Sudan became a regular feature of the pilgrimage season from the mid-1920s. The Nigerian Pilgrimage Scheme effectively placed a colonial imprimatur on the system that was already in place, allowing most pilgrims to do what they had already intended to do and providing contingency plans for those who evaded the minimalist regulations imposed. Such a system, however, depended on the structures of the British Empire to function. In the years after the Second World War, it became increasingly clear that the laissez-faire attitude toward pilgrimage regulation was no longer tenable in a rapidly decolonising world.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

Decolonising the Hajj

The pilgrimage from Nigeria to Mecca under empire and independence

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 267 114 7
Full Text Views 45 42 0
PDF Downloads 37 33 0