Kristin Bergtora Sandvik
Search for other papers by Kristin Bergtora Sandvik in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Power, risk and riskiness in digital humanitarian work
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

Chapter 3, The power, risk and riskiness of digital humanitarian work examines the politics of digital humanitarian work and the role of humanitarian workers. The chapter takes the claim that technology has redistributed power in the humanitarian field as its point of departure, arguing that there has been no redistribution of influence or more equitable participation bringing empowerment but rather an accumulation of power by humanitarian organizations, governments and the private sector. At the same time, technology has not only created new sites and forms of risk for humanitarians themselves but also transformed their work into a source of risk for individuals and communities in crisis. The chapter explores these issues in the light of the book’s overarching concern with humanitarian action as a practice of extraction, examining three important themes: the shifting constitution of humanitarian expertise, the role of technology in mitigating risk to humanitarian workers and finally, taking digital refugee lawyering as the primary topical example, I examine the notion of humanitarian work as being risky for individuals and communities in crisis, and for the operations and the reputations of humanitarian actors.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

Humanitarian extractivism

The digital transformation of aid

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 601 377 56
Full Text Views 48 9 0
PDF Downloads 42 12 0