J. Peter Burgess
Search for other papers by J. Peter Burgess in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
There is no alternative to security
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

This chapter studies what has been called the ‘alternative 22/7 Commission’ report. The report, commissioned and curated by the Ministry of Justice and Police, analysed the 22/7 attacks through a different lens, with different premises and different operational expectations. The chapter studies in particular the concept of societal security ‘work’, central to the practical perspective of the ministry. It shows that, whereas the expected output of the report prioritises functional and operational solutions, the sources for that output build on significantly more cultural and social depth than that of the 22/7 Commission report. The chapter explores the report’s mobilisation of the conceptual pair ‘prevention’ and ‘preparedness’ widely used in risk and crisis literature. It argues that the distinction between the two core ideas is not simply one of different phases of relating to risk but rather of different ways of existing in relation to them. The chapter follows this insight into the conventional discussion of what operational cooperation across different societal sectors and agencies can and should be. It opens a discussion on the societal complexity of the risk and the limits of understanding and governing risk as a national system. The chapter concludes with an in-depth analysis of what is understood as risk to ‘critical infrastructure’, asking what constitutes the critical or indispensable in this critical infrastructure.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

Security after the unthinkable

Terror and disenchantment in Norway

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 389 361 49
Full Text Views 0 0 0
PDF Downloads 0 0 0