J. Peter Burgess
Search for other papers by J. Peter Burgess in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
After thought
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

This chapter looks beyond the book’s findings and suggests a range of social, political, moral and metaphysical implications about security and disenchantment that open up. It begins with a discussion of the processes of memorialisation of 22 July 2011 and the continuities and discontinuities they produced. It then turns to a brief summary of the bureaucratic reforms undertaken as a direct consequence of the attack in order to draw conclusions about the temporality of the aftermath. Questions about what changed, what can be changed and what should be changed are raised in order to ground a series of arguments and commentaries about the philosophical sense of security and insecurity and about the way this is experienced. The chapter closes by admonishing the dangers of the bureaucratic closure so typical of our time, suggesting that bureaucracy does not inoculate against the malady of insecurity but may indeed anaesthetise against it.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

Security after the unthinkable

Terror and disenchantment in Norway

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 49 49 11
Full Text Views 0 0 0
PDF Downloads 1 1 0