Jana Fey
Search for other papers by Jana Fey in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Governing vulnerability
Mental distress, neoliberalism and COVID-19
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

This chapter explores vulnerability and mental health as conceptual tools and discourses of governance in the United KingdomUK. In doing so, it applies critical approaches to studying vulnerability and mental distress under neoliberal structures to the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Firstly, the chapter sketches the current hegemony of neoliberal logics and austerity policies and their instrumentaliszation of vulnerability as a concept to justify harmful economic restrictions. Secondly, the previous discussion is contextualizsed into the government’'s handling of these issues during the pandemic, showing that the crisis exposed vulnerability as an unstable concept. In the third section, the chapter initiates a discussion about the ways in which mental health was invoked as a discursive tool by anti-lockdown activists. The chapter contributes to previous literature about the use of vulnerability discourse to demonstrate that the concept of mental health is increasingly used to legitimisze welfare restrictions, and by providing an analysis of this during the coronavirus pandemic. It concludes by arguing that change begins through centring the voices of those deemed vulnerable or mentally distressed in the creation of categorising frameworks and policies.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

Vulnerability

Governing the social through security politics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 401 168 45
Full Text Views 48 26 0
PDF Downloads 36 21 0