Charlotte Heath-Kelly
Search for other papers by Charlotte Heath-Kelly in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Counterterrorism and psychiatry
Re- bordering vulnerability and securitisation in UK public protection
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

This chapter explores the complex overlap between public protection, psychiatry and national security in UK public protection. In the 2011 Prevent Strategy, counter-radicalisation was presented as a ‘safeguarding’ response designed to identify vulnerable individuals who posed a potential threat to the public. Vulnerability was presented as equally distributed across society. Unlike traditional safeguarding, referrals do not rely upon a disability, drug dependency or violent living conditions to frame someone as vulnerable to abuse; instead, extreme ideologies supposedly render everyone potentially vulnerable to terrorist transformation. Since 2015 there has been an enormous increase in Prevent referrals to over 7,000 per year. This increase has provoked policy interventions that seek to reframe vulnerability to radicalisation, to facilitate greater efficiency in public protection. The chapter explores the operations of the ‘vulnerability support hubs’, which bring psychologists into counterterrorism policing headquarters to purport to identify the most ‘high-risk’ potential terrorists for medical detention or surveillance. Like the ‘hubs’, the reform of public protection arrangements (MAPPA) also frames the state as vulnerable to the actions of disordered individuals. Efficiency drives have produced a ‘waxing and waning’ of ‘vulnerability’ in UK public protection, with psychiatry taking on significant responsibility for securing the ‘vulnerable’ state.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

Vulnerability

Governing the social through security politics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 803 555 154
PDF Downloads 249 114 6