P. R. Kumaraswamy
Search for other papers by P. R. Kumaraswamy in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
India’s dilemmas of pragmatism v. principles
Nehru’s preference for a partitioned India but a federal Palestine
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

While the acceptance of a communal partition in the Indian subcontinent was a collective majority decision of the Indian National Congress Party, Jawaharlal Nehru (prime minister of the interim government since September 1946 and of free India from 15 August 1947) was the architect of the federal plan for Palestine. His approach towards colonial situations and partition as a possible solution to communal problems in India and Palestine highlighted his dichotomy between pragmatism necessitated by the politico-territorial immediacy of the Indian condition, and moral posturing facilitated by geographical distance. Having achieved independence through communal partition, he was urging the Jews and Arabs of Palestine to coexist under one political authority through accommodation and cooperation. The federal plan was not only a sign of Indian naivety regarding international diplomacy, but also a reflection of its duality; political pragmatism was confined to the subcontinent while moral eloquence was visible and useful elsewhere. The duality towards the two partitions was compounded by the uncritical adulation of the federal plan by various Indian scholars and writers.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

The breakup of India and Palestine

The causes and legacies of partition

Editors: and

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1494 485 49
Full Text Views 45 31 0
PDF Downloads 41 30 0