Stephen Cummins
Search for other papers by Stephen Cummins in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Conclusion
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

The conclusion of this book draws together the insights of the preceding chapters. This looks at the discussion of ‘enmity’ in jurisprudence and juridical practice, both as evidence towards guilt but also how the notion was embedded in the process by which the Neapolitan state attempted to rule through justice. Local disputes were reflected, refracted, and distorted through jurisprudential languages of enmity. But the legal aspects of enmity were also central to how it was experienced as a relationship. The institution of the remission shaped the aftermaths of violent crimes. Love, friendship, forgiveness, and hatred were integral parts of state and legal processes of peace-making. The overlap between law and the emotions is clearly seen in the value that the Jesuits placed on the notarial recording of forgiveness and the variety of grief, resentment, and hatreds that fractured any southern Italian community. The conclusion shows this history of offences, hatred, grief, and reconciliation is central to understanding the early modern Kingdom of Naples.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

States of Enmity

The politics of hatred in the early modern Kingdom of Naples

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 169 169 169
Full Text Views 0 0 0
PDF Downloads 0 0 0