Jonathan P. Marshall
Search for other papers by Jonathan P. Marshall in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Ambiguity and politics
The suppression of complexity in Australian governmental responses to climate change
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

Simone de Beauvoir insisted that ambiguity and uncertainty are important parts of human life, ethics and politics, and yet people often defend themselves against this ambiguity. Ambiguity arises because humans live within extended complex systems, which are unpredictable in detail, difficult to conceive and hard to put boundaries around. De Beauvoir herself downplays ambiguities in the name of ‘freedom’ and avoids extending ethical concern to the nonhuman world because she considers it ‘determined’ with little value. Martin Buber’s writings on relationality help us understand varieties of concern and suggest ways concern can be both extended and retracted. These understandings are used here to explore the ways that Australian climate and energy policy suppresses (or creates) ambiguity and avoids facing up to problems of complexity, largely through ‘the religion of The Market’. This is illustrated through considerations of: a) current government policy, b) the construction of the New Energy Market, and c) the then political oppositions’ alternatives. The chapter argues that openness to ambiguity, uncertainty and complexity and the unintended consequences of human interaction with the ecological world are essential for dealing with problems of climate change and ecological destruction.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 132 132 33
Full Text Views 4 4 0
PDF Downloads 5 5 0