Catherine Tebaldi
Search for other papers by Catherine Tebaldi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Rae Jereza
Search for other papers by Rae Jereza in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Ethnographic empathy and research ethics as methodological whiteness
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

In this chapter, we assert that ethnographic calls to empathy and narratives ‘through the eyes of the other’ are forms of methodological whiteness, a form of ‘emotional objectivity’ which presumes and creates a sharp division between the ethnographer and his other. Through both institutional and academic scripts, ethnographers of the far right inadvertently justify far-right politics in ways that ignore the violent effects and implications of the latter’s practices and discourses on cis women, LGBTQ+ communities, and Black, Brown, Indigenous, Latinx, and Asian and Pacific Islander people and reproduce the colonial ethnographer – white, impartial, and emotionally neutral – as default. In this chapter, we, two anthropologists from very different backgrounds, explore the institutional reproduction of the colonial ethnographer as default and assert the importance of utilising anti-colonial, feminist approaches to counter this tendency.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

The ethics of researching the far right

Critical approaches and reflections

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 649 565 69
Full Text Views 33 27 0
PDF Downloads 42 34 0