David Farrell-Banks
Search for other papers by David Farrell-Banks in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Lorna-Jane Richardson
Search for other papers by Lorna-Jane Richardson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Heritage, archaeology, ancestry, and the far right
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

References to the past are a common feature of the discourse and recruitment tactics of far-right groups. This chapter offers reflections drawn from our collective experience in archaeology, heritage, and museum studies and practice. With allusions to ancestry and belonging frequent in archaeological and heritage discourse, we argue for a recognition of potentially nationalistic discourse within these fields as an ethical priority. The chapter provides details of recent references to and uses of heritage and archaeology in the activities of far-right groups in the United Kingdom, giving particular attention to the construction of racial superiority based on mythological ancestral links to place and nationhood. While there has been an increasing recognition of this in archaeology and heritage studies in recent years, this continues to emerge from academic and professional fields that are severely lacking in diversity. Additionally, scholars engaged in this work are often the target of online harassment and abuse. Recognising that these risks will be felt more starkly by people of colour or other marginalised groups, the chapter concludes by outlining the ethical need to create conditions where the necessary research into heritage, archaeology, and the far right can take place.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

The ethics of researching the far right

Critical approaches and reflections

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 805 710 63
Full Text Views 9 7 1
PDF Downloads 12 9 2