Antonia Vaughan
Search for other papers by Antonia Vaughan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Negotiating contradiction in success and safety
A consideration of environmental constraints on risk management
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

Academics are increasingly understood as being at risk from harms such as networked harassment, threats, attacks to credibility, and vicarious trauma. Best practice for protection against such harms emphasises the importance of obscurity, control over available information, and the prioritisation of personal wellbeing. However, researchers operate within a neoliberal environment that rewards visibility and productivity, in part through engagement with the digital sphere, public scholarship, and publication. By focusing on two harms (networked harassment and vicarious trauma), this chapter highlights how the behaviours necessary for success contradict best practice for managing risk. It argues that this contradiction produces an antagonistic relationship between success and safety, requiring researchers to negotiate between the two. Ultimately, this chapter critiques the individualisation of responsibility for success and safety which overlooks the uneven experience of harm and invisibilises how environmental factors constrain researchers’ abilities to protect themselves. In doing so, the system privileges certain voices and increasingly embeds harm in the conduct of such research.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

The ethics of researching the far right

Critical approaches and reflections

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 576 529 49
Full Text Views 17 17 0
PDF Downloads 18 18 0