Jackson Wood
Search for other papers by Jackson Wood in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Spectre
Covert research in digital far-right ‘red zones’
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

Contemporary researchers of the far right face a range of ethical challenges, including navigating institutional ethics. I argue in this chapter that Human Research Ethics Committees (HRECs) stifle innovative research when it is perceived as ‘risky’, which has the effect of reproducing harmful discourses about the far right. I draw upon my own experience, where my doctoral research methods were labelled the “modus operandi of fictional political thrillers”. My methods involved covert participant observation of far-right digital spaces, which posed an undue risk for the HREC for two overlapping reasons. First, covert research challenges notions of informed consent, which is typically presumed to be a baseline requirement for ethical research. Second, the HREC drew on popular, media-driven stereotypes of the far right, which had the effect of constructing my field site as a metaphorical digital ‘red zone’. In turn, the HREC was discursively positioned to consider my research as prima facie risky. Overall, I argue that institutional ethics would benefit from drawing on the rationalities of situated ethics and cultures of care, which treat ethics as an ongoing social practice rather than a one-off process.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

The ethics of researching the far right

Critical approaches and reflections

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 486 419 40
Full Text Views 6 6 0
PDF Downloads 6 6 0