Joan Braune
Search for other papers by Joan Braune in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Harms of the compassion narrative
Ethical considerations regarding stories of disengagement from white supremacist movements
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

In interviews, memoirs, and public lectures, dozens of former neo-Nazis and others have shared stories following a common pattern. These ‘compassion narratives’ describe an encounter between a member of a hate group and a member of a group the hater had dehumanised. An unexpected act of compassion by the dehumanised other is met with surprise, shame, and cognitive dissonance by the hater, who later reflects on the experience and changes their beliefs. Compassion narratives are subject to a variety of problems, including: (1) they may have potentially harmful psychological impacts on victims/survivors of hate or targeted communities; (2) they may be inaccurate, sometimes unintentionally so; (3) they may unintentionally undermine boundaries that keep communities safe, by encouraging risky outreach to extremists; and (4) they perpetuate hegemonic racist and oppressive narratives that task targets of hate with outreach to haters. Considering these and other possible issues, researchers may wish to avoid amplifying compassion narratives. The chapter concludes with recommendations for engaging ethically with compassion narratives, including proposing a shift in power and narrative focus to fascism’s victims and targets.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

The ethics of researching the far right

Critical approaches and reflections

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 28 28 2
Full Text Views 8 8 0
PDF Downloads 0 0 0