Carina Hoerst
Search for other papers by Carina Hoerst in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
John Drury
Search for other papers by John Drury in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Examining far-right empowerment experiences using YouTube and Parler data
Managing researcher safety and ethical and methodological requirements
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

The chapter discusses how a social-psychological investigation of collective psychological empowerment among attendees of the Charlottesville Unite the Right rally and the Capitol insurrection was complicated by existing ethical frameworks that came into conflict with methodological requirements. This case is discussed as representative of a broader consideration of the impact of existing (but not always suitable) ethical frameworks on maintaining the integrity of the research in extremism studies and establishing safety and credibility as an (early-career) researcher. It illustrates how the use of secondary data (video material from ProPublica and YouTube) from the two rallies facilitated access to the subject of investigation whose identity did not align with the identity of the researchers and how the objective of retrieving ‘interview-like’ data aided with reconciling methodological and ethical challenges.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

The ethics of researching the far right

Critical approaches and reflections

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 617 519 34
Full Text Views 11 8 0
PDF Downloads 16 10 0