Pavan Mano
Search for other papers by Pavan Mano in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
The work of kinship
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

Chapter 3 interrogates the work that kinship is made to do in service of the nation. Historicizing the heterosexual nuclear family shows how the abstract concept of family is narrowly defined by the ontological relations given to us by the language of kinship. Gendered relations of care and support are transformed into obligations, aided and abetted by gestures towards ‘Asian’ values. Kinship, together with its attendant obligations, is thus given pride of place in the hierarchy of social relations. Whilst treating kinship in this way typically privileges the heterosexual nuclear family unit, the chapter examines the historic 2018 judgement in UKM v. Attorney-General as an instance where logics of kinship were placed in direct contestation with the logics of heterosexual coupling. Whilst non-normative forms of kinship and parenting are far from entrenched, I read the outcome of UKM v. Attorney-General as reflecting the salience of heteronormative familism in organizing social relations in Singapore.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

Straight nation

Heteronormativity and other exigencies of postcolonial nationalism

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 257 257 34
Full Text Views 4 4 4
PDF Downloads 6 6 6