Brian Heffernan
Search for other papers by Brian Heffernan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Mighty victims
Suffering and spiritual warfare, 1872–1920
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

Of the many traditions from which the Carmelite sisters could draw, dolorism, the spirituality of suffering, was dominant in this period. Asceticism was the common heritage of most religious institutes, and it inspired a thousand and one precepts in the Carmelite books of rules and customs, the most striking of which was strict enclosure. But dolorist spirituality went beyond asceticism and the usual practices of fasting and self-abnegation. The accompanying discourse that can be reconstructed from normative sources as well as from sisters’ egodocuments emphasised the meritorious nature of accepting illness and adversity, of voluntary humiliation and the deliberate infliction of pain through mortification of the body. This spirituality of vicarious suffering or victim spirituality interpreted suffering as a sacrifice that was efficacious before God, and that therefore constituted a valuable spiritual good that could be used as a weapon in the culture war. Many sources testify to the appeal that the gendered appropriation of this spiritual tradition had for sisters, an appeal that was differently inflected for sisters of different national backgrounds. The chapter also addresses the paradoxes of the dolorist performance of the cloistered life, as well as the presence of alternative constructions of spirituality, such as mental prayer and various devotions, although these were often themselves infused by dolorism.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

Modern Carmelite nuns and contemplative identities

Shaping spirituality in the Netherlands

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 855 843 28
Full Text Views 4 3 0
PDF Downloads 4 2 0