Darren Freebury-Jones
Search for other papers by Darren Freebury-Jones in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Conclusion
Our other Shake-scenes
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

While the idea of Shakespeare guiding younger dramatists in his later co-authored plays is now generally accepted, there remains some unwillingness to accept that Shakespeare himself was guided in earlier collaborations. Scholars still prefer to imagine Shakespeare improving, or even salvaging, the work of more experienced dramatists, rather than learning from the process of co-authorship at the beginning of his career. This conclusion interrogates such reticence in tandem with older scholarship reluctant to see Shakespeare as a borrower, scholarship that instead assumes other dramatists borrowed from him. It looks at the ways in which the compilers of the First Folio helped to create the image of Shakespeare as a solitary genius. Shakespeare’s dramatic identity was shaped in large part by the people with whom he collaborated most. It is time for readers to fully recognise that in his lifetime Shakespeare was a member of a community of playwrights, his works embedded in a network of affiliation and indebtedness within the early modern writing scene. He was not, to quote Greene’s Groatsworth of Wit, ‘the only Shake-scene in a country’.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

Shakespeare’s borrowed feathers

How early modern playwrights shaped the world’s greatest writer

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 20521 20521 159
Full Text Views 4 4 0
PDF Downloads 2 2 0