Colin Seymour-Ure
Search for other papers by Colin Seymour-Ure in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Gould’s armoury
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

The author begins with the question: ‘What made Gould’s cartoons so good?’ He answers it by applauding his ability to get a likeness (especially at a time when press photography was rare) and his skill at ‘getting to the nub of an issue’, adding that Gould was ‘essentially a journalist who draws his leading articles instead of writing them’. He also used a wide range of imagery, which the author arranges into eight categories (broadly coinciding with those in E.H. Gombrich’s classic essay ‘The Cartoonist’s Armoury’). These are: 1) Common cultural references; 2) Everyday images and figures of speech; 3) Occupations (policeman, farmer); 4) Sport and games (swimming, chess, football); 5) Topical events (e.g. St Valentine’s Day, the Great Comet of 1895, Suffragettes); 6) Theatre/literature/visual arts; 7) History and 8) Animals. He also notes that Gould’s humour was an important contribution to his success. As the cartoonist himself said ‘I etch with vinegar, not vitriol’. The author concludes that ‘His geniality, courtesy, gentle caricature, lack of malice, all point towards the wry smile. His strength is in the humour of incongruity – the discovery of unexpected aptness in incongruous comparisons, the more unlikely the funnier.’

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

The picture politics of Sir Francis Carruthers Gould

Britain’s pioneering political cartoonist

Editor:

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 245 245 23
Full Text Views 0 0 0
PDF Downloads 0 0 0