Emel Akçali
Search for other papers by Emel Akçali in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
The European Union’s competency in conflict resolution
The cases of Bosnia, Macedonia and Cyprus
in Cyprus
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

Sovereignty is a limited property with a strong normative dimension which cannot automatically follow on from empirical facts on the ground. This chapter argues that when post-modern power-sharing solutions to secessionist conflicts are developed and proposed within a modern framework prioritising the territorial integrity of existing states, the gap between facts and norms often remains unbridged. Internationally sponsored federal power-sharing solutions often legitimise and fuel the modern attributes of ethno-political conflicts, while claiming to diffuse them. To illustrate this, the author compares two unsettled conflicts in Europe – Cyprus and Moldova – and one conflict – Bosnia and Herzegovina – in which the international community has imposed a loose federal settlement on the parties. The Bosnian case illustrates that an imposed federal solution (the Dayton agreement) actually encouraged internal de facto states to legitimise their existence and discouraged them from renouncing claims to sovereignty and territory.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

Cyprus

A conflict at the crossroads

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 353 353 9
Full Text Views 1 1 0
PDF Downloads 2 2 0