Lee Jarvis
Search for other papers by Lee Jarvis in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Michael Lister
Search for other papers by Michael Lister in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Less, more, or otherwise (in)secure?
Anti-terrorism powers and vernacular (in)securities
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

This chapter analyses the impact of anti-terrorism powers on public experiences of security within the UK. The chapter begins by reiterating the widespread public scepticism toward these powers identified in Chapter 3. A major factor within this scepticism, it argues, was the pervasive view that security has not been enhanced by recent initiatives in this area. Indeed, some individuals - primarily from ethnic minority communities - believed that their security has been directly diminished by the introduction of new anti-terrorism powers. To fully understand this scepticism, however, requires a deeper engagement with public understandings of security, and differences between these. To do this, the chapter begins by exploring public articulations of security threats before introducing six distinct ways that participants in this research discussed the concept of security. Here, security was linked to notions of survival, belonging, hospitality, equality, freedom and insecurity, respectively.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 200 95 2
Full Text Views 78 17 0
PDF Downloads 35 10 0