Tod’s sympathetic understanding of Rajput difference
in Knowledge, mediation and empire
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact for pricing options.


If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

Tod’s deliberate choice to simultaneously defend the Rajputs as a historically grounded people capable of moving into the modern world, while also upholding the beneficial effects of prolonged British rule in India can explain his political efforts to incite respect among the British authorities for the Rajputs’ sense of honour, with the intention of preventing Rajput rejection of any humiliating imposition of external British Rule. This political message of tolerance, which went against the dominant British way of thinking at the time, also situates Tod as an individual who refused to conform to simplistic, binary oppositions of powers, or races, or nations. A few comparisons of Tod’s trajectory with other scholarly British traveller-philanthropists, in the Middle East for example, highlight the particularities of Tod’s role concerning knowledge constructions about the Rajputs and the Gujaratis.

Knowledge, mediation and empire

James Tod’s journeys among the Rajputs




All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 69 15 0
Full Text Views 41 17 0
PDF Downloads 11 7 0