A director and his methods
in Laurent Cantet
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact manchesterhive@manchester.ac.uk for pricing options.


If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

After giving a brief overview of Cantet’s career, this chapter explores what one might call the director’s two methods. The former relates to his preference for using amateur actors as experts on their own social role and having long periods of work-shopping in the run up to shooting so that the script can be reshaped in a dialogic process. The latter is to do with the way he constructs his plots around the melodramatic encounter between the individual, the group, and the social context, investigates the power dynamics embedded in the spaces of the films and uses moments of shame to force underlying tensions to the surface. This interrogative and self-effacing style of authorship means that the director effectively hollows out his own voice and allows for something akin to a polyphonic, Bakhtinian interplay to take place.


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 64 9 3
Full Text Views 16 1 0
PDF Downloads 14 5 0