Conclusion
Categories and conversations
in Classical Hollywood cinema
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact manchesterhive@manchester.ac.uk for pricing options.

ACCESS TOKENS

If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

The conclusion defends the methodology adopted by the book – in particular, its abstention from the proposal of a taxonomy of point of view (a very common feature of scholarly work on this topic), and its utilisation instead of close and, it is suggested, ‘conversational’ engagement with specific films. It is argued that such a method should be accepted as one mode of ‘theorising’, and that it is a method that has the virtue of granting a valuable degree of autonomy to the artworks and the readers it encounters.

Classical Hollywood cinema

Point of view and communication

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 30 8 1
Full Text Views 40 1 0
PDF Downloads 13 0 0