The space of desire in Chaucer’s and Shakespeare’s Troy
in Love, history and emotion in Chaucer and Shakespeare
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact for pricing options.


If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

Geoffrey Chaucer's and William Shakespeare's fictional Troys are shadowed and abetted by each poet's experience of London. Both imaginary Troys reduplicate London's public and, especially, private gardens. Shakespeare's city is similarly gossip-filled. Gossip is, in fact, the Trojans' favourite game. Troilus's stewe seems as a place of mounting and almost debilitating erotic excitement, functioning like one of Wilhelm Reich's twentieth-century orgone boxes to feed and stoke desire. Pandarus's 'gear' comprises his own connivance and also the crucial fittings of erotic encounter, bed and chamber: a fusion of place and purpose. The chamber promises to become a privileged erotic arena by fostering privacy even as it protects reputation but it turns out to be a highly permeable line of defence. The chamber is not just a place of solitude but, equally often, a putatively private social space.

Love, history and emotion in Chaucer and Shakespeare

Troilus and Criseyde and Troilus and Cressida


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 44 6 0
Full Text Views 35 1 0
PDF Downloads 16 4 0