What’s Hecuba to him?
Absence, silence and lament in Troilus and Criseyde and Troilus and Cressida
in Love, history and emotion in Chaucer and Shakespeare
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact manchesterhive@manchester.ac.uk for pricing options.


If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

This chapter argues that Hecuba is a potent absent presence in the play, and focuses on the effects of her absence, especially on the characterization of Cressida. Troilus and Cressida was probably written very soon after Hamlet, and William Shakespeare was certainly thinking about the Troy story when he was composing Hamlet. The Legend of Good Women specifically cites Troilus and Criseyde in order to declare itself as a palinode to that preceding text. Two absent presences in the play, in addition to Hecuba and implicitly Cressida herself, are the women who wait in the literary afterlives of Ulysses and Aeneas, Penelope and Dido. In the Euripidean tradition Hecuba is not only the catalyst for lamentation among the other Trojan women but is the locus of affect more generally for other participants, mortal and divine, and for readers and audiences.

Love, history and emotion in Chaucer and Shakespeare

Troilus and Criseyde and Troilus and Cressida


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 62 10 0
Full Text Views 34 1 0
PDF Downloads 13 3 0