‘Stewed phrase’ and the impassioned imagination in Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida
in Love, history and emotion in Chaucer and Shakespeare
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact manchesterhive@manchester.ac.uk for pricing options.


If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

In Troilus and Cressida, the major characters revel in all kinds of received wisdom, commonplaces and topical truths. While Cressida chooses to dissemble her passion in a Petrarchan manner, Troilus has already abandoned the dimension of courtliness. The principal actors in the interplay between the faculties of the mind are perception, imagination, memory, reason and passion. In the models current in William Shakespeare's time, imagination, memory and reason reside in different chambers or ventricles of the mind, which are not hermetically sealed against each other. Ulysses' attempts to validate Stoic magnanimity crashes, the cognitive therapy of pride failing to affect the patient's imagination. Stoicism may be a philosophy of coherence, of living in accordance with oneself of the good flow of life, but it is all this by virtue of its also being a philosophy of self-mastery.

Love, history and emotion in Chaucer and Shakespeare

Troilus and Criseyde and Troilus and Cressida


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 35 12 1
Full Text Views 37 13 0
PDF Downloads 12 4 0