Trying to get equal opportunities
Women in the higher grades of the LCC and the Civil Service in the first half of the twentieth century
in Gender, rhetoric and regulation
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact for pricing options.


If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

Building on chapter one, this chapter examines the similarly gendered nature of women’s work on the higher (executive and administrative) grades in both organisations. It looks at the various types of rhetoric used to preserve women’s subordinate position and the campaigns by women public servants and their supporters (both inside and outside their institutions) to improve women’s opportunities. It provides an account of the debates around segregated versus aggregated grading structures and demonstrates the strength of many campaigners’ arguments that aggregation was the best means to try to bring about long-term equity between men’s and women’s opportunities. The chapter also provides, as far as records allow, a quantitative assessment of women’s likelihood, compared to men’s, of being appointed to a particular grade via the examination process.

Gender, rhetoric and regulation

Women’s work in the Civil Service and the London County Council, 1900–55


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 71 7 1
Full Text Views 26 5 0
PDF Downloads 19 2 0