Reform and the Merovingian Church
in Religious Franks
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact for pricing options.


If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

This chapter reinforces the challenges that have already been made to the model of a Merovingian Church in almost constant need of reform, which derives above all from Gregory the Great, Jonas of Bobbio and Boniface. In particular, it stresses how unreliable Jonas is as a guide to understanding the ecclesiastical history of the Merovingian period. The chapter shows that the heirs of Columbanus and the circle of Boniface rather overemphasised what was wrong with the previous regime: the rhetoric of reform automatically involves the denigration of what has gone before. The extent to which the Anglo-Saxon missionary and his followers really marked a new departure has been the subject of discussion ever since Eugen Ewig published his groundbreaking 'Milo et eiusmodi similes'.

Religious Franks

Religion and power in the Frankish Kingdoms: studies in honour of Mayke de Jong


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 97 41 7
Full Text Views 25 3 0
PDF Downloads 26 8 0